Evaluation of BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 plus for Detection of Bordetella pertussis in Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens from Children with Clinically Suspected Pertussis.

The objective of this study was to compare the performances of BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 (RP2) plus, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and culture for the detection of Bordetella pertussis in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. Consecutive NPS specimens were collected from patients with clinically suspected pertussis from 1 March 1 to 31 July 2018 in Shenzhen Children's Hospital. All the specimens were tested in parallel by RP2 plus, qPCR, and culture methods. A total of 464 children were enrolled in this study. The positive pertussis rates of culture, RP2 plus, and qPCR were 23.1%, 39.0%, and 38.4%, respectively. Compared to the combined reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were, respectively, 56.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2 to 63.7%), 100% (98.3 to 100%), 100% (95.7 to 100%), and 77.0% (72.2 to 81.2%) for culture, 89.9% (84.5 to 93.7%), 96.0% (92.8 to 97.9%), 93.9% (89.1 to 96.8%), and 93.3% (89.5 to 95.8%) for RP2 plus, and 86.8% (80.9 to 91.1%), 94.9% (91.4 to 97.1%), 92.1% (86.9 to 95.5%), and 91.3% (87.2 to 94.2%) for qPCR. The most prevalent codetected pathogen was human rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 99, 52.4%), followed by parainfluenza virus (n =32, 16.9%) and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 29, 15.3%), in children with B. pertussis present, which was consistent with the top three pathogens previously found in children with B. pertussis absent. Turnaround times for RP2 plus, qPCR, and culture were 2 h, 8 h, and 120 h, respectively. RP2 plus quickly and accurately detected B. pertussis, providing valuable information for an early clinical diagnosis and optimal choice of therapy. IMPORTANCE In recent years, there have been some epidemic or local outbreaks of pertussis in countries with high vaccination rates. One of the crucial factors in controlling pertussis is early diagnosis, which is based on specific laboratory measurements, including culture, serological tests, and PCR assays. Compared to culture and serological tests, PCR is more suitable for clinical application, with a fast detection speed of several hours independent of the disease stage and individual vaccination status. BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 plus, a multiplex PCR assay for simultaneously detecting 22 respiratory pathogens, facilitates the quick detection of Bordetella pertussis and coinfecting respiratory pathogens. It also provides valuable information for an early clinical diagnosis and optimal choice of therapy for children with clinically suspected pertussis.

Bordetella pertussis is a common pathogen in infants hospitalized for acute lower respiratory tract infection during the winter season.

INTRODUCTION: There is some evidence that Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) can co-infect with viral respiratory infections in young infants. METHODS: B. pertussis infection was studied by culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) from nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) in 49 infants < 12 months of age, who were admitted for lower respiratory tract infections during the winter season. Seven other possible viral pathogens were documented by antigen detection or PCR in NPSs. The clinical feature of infants with mixed infection of B. pertussis and respiratory viruses were examined. RESULTS: Overall, B. pertussis infection was found in 10 (20.4%) cases, nine were less than 6 months of age and seven were unvaccinated. Viral etiology was found in 41 (84%) cases and pertussis-viral co-infection was present in eight patients, five of whom had mixed infection with respiratory syncytial virus. Only the presence of staccato coughing, cyanosis, and lymphocytosis were significantly different in B. pertussis-positive cases compared with B. pertussis-negative cases. Of the 10 pertussis cases, only the culture-positive cases showed the typical symptoms and laboratory findings of pertussis in addition to virus-associated respiratory symptoms with severe hospital course, whereas cases identified as DNA-positive lacked the characteristics of pertussis and their clinical severities were the same as B. pertussis-negative cases. CONCLUSION: In the absence of typical paroxysmal cough and lymphocytosis, we should carefully consider diagnosis of pertussis in young children hospitalized for presumed viral respiratory illness according to local epidemiological surveillance.